Scientists: “Exclusive Club” To Assume Command Of Global Geo-Engineering

Jurriaan Maessen - March 5, 2013

Scientific publication envisions “a strategic multilateral implementation (of planetary scale geoengineering) through an exclusive ‘club’ that increases benefits to members at the expense of those excluded.”

In a recent publication published by Environmental Research Letters, three scientists have published the results of a computer simulation “game”, probing several scenario’s on how to best organize a “unilateral implementation scheme” of global geoengineering.

“(…) a sufficiently powerful international coalition might be able to deploy solar geoengineering. Here, we show that regional differences in climate outcomes create strategic incentives to form coalitions that are as small as possible, while still powerful enough to deploy solar geoengineering.”

Defining geoengineering as “intentionally reducing the amount of sunlight that reaches Earth’s surface through the use of stratospheric aerosols”, the authors used climate models (such as the ones used by the IPCC) as the basis for their “gaming” activities- which they describe as “global thermostat setting game”:

“The characteristics of coalitions to geoengineer climate are modeled using a ‘global thermostat setting game’ based on climate model results. Coalition members have incentives to exclude non-members that would prevent implementation of solar geoengineering at a level that is optimal for the existing coalition.”, authors Katharine Ricke and Ken Caldeira point out.

Under “rules and assumptions” the authors explain that “the game takes place in two stages.”

“During the first stage players choose their memberships and the winning coalition is formed. In the second stage, the winning coalition acts as a single actor to maximize the benefits of geoengineering to all coalition members. Players outside the coalition do not make decisions in this second stage.”

From the assertion that man made climate change will have different results from region to region, the scientists involved in this modeling business factored these differences into their “global thermostat setting game”, as a result of which researched different international coalitions that would be most likely to succeed in starting and maintaining a global geoengineering effort:

“(…) If a decision were made somehow to move ahead with the deployment of an intentionally introduced stratospheric aerosol layer, some regions might prefer a cooling or warming relative to the current climate, creating complicated problems in setting the global thermostat. In addition, several modeling studies have demonstrated that if solar geoengineering is used to compensate for rising greenhouse-gas concentrations and is then stopped abruptly, very rapid warming can occur. Thus, if solar geoengineering is ever implemented, stopping suddenly poses a threat.”

From this assertion follows a draconian consequence, namely that only a sustained geongineering effort of the earth’s atmosphere on the part of an international coalition can do the job. The premise of the paper, supported by their computer simulations, is that an “exclusive club” of nations taking the rein, would be the best way to sustain such a spraying campaign for a sufficient period of time:

“a strategic multilateral implementation through an exclusive ‘club’ that increases benefits to members at the expense of those excluded. If the option of a global coalition is accounted for in formulating a system of intracoalitional transfers, the game presented here always produces a stable and powerful coalition in which all coalition members benefit from excluding other parties.”

The rational behind this seemingly contradictory statement reads as follows:

“Under an exclusive coalitions model of international agreements to geoengineer, if one coalition breaks down, another is ready and eager to take its place. As the potential harm from termination grows (i.e., as the amount of greenhouse-gas forcings being compensated for with geoengineering increases), so too do the incentives to avoid this termination among all potential coalitions.”

That the geoengineering efforts by this exclusive club are a thing of the long haul is evident from the authors’ assertion that “if the coalition so decides, solar geoengineering can be implemented starting in 2015 and negotiations among club members only will determine the setting of the global thermostat for the next ten years. In each subsequent decade, negotiations begin anew, and determine a new thermostat setting for the next ten years.”

After the publication lists the outcomes of their gaming models, they conclude by stating that the “exclusive club” scenario, as opposed to an inclusive one, turns out to be the desired way to move forward:

“(…) the results of our game simulations show the maximum achievable benefits regions can gain by acting strategically to form exclusive clubs; this necessarily imposes damages on non-members relative to their preferences”.

The outcomes of this publication are inherently draconian, especially if we take into account the fact that the World Economic Forum in its latest Global Risks report warned that a “rogue nation” or individual could “hijack” global climate change for nefarious purposes. The report mentions several possible scenario’s, or X-factors, which could occur in the coming year, among which (page 57) a geoengineering nightmare, according to the report, “in which a country or small group of countries precipitates an international crisis by moving ahead with deployment or large-scale research independent of the global community. The global climate could, in effect, be hijacked by a rogue country or even a wealthy individual, with unpredict­able costs to agriculture, infrastructure and global stability.”

This is an ironical confusion like only top globalist factions can produce. Where the World Economic Forum warns us about possible “rogue” parties moving ahead with planetary-wide geoengineering schemes, another group of globalist-funded scientists suggest an “exclusive club” shoud take the reins over global spraying efforts to “offset global warming”.

In the WEF-report we get the impression that the “rogue” parties described are parties that have not or will not sign onto global agreements presided over by the UN. This, according to the report, “leaves a gap for unregulated experimentation.”

“For example”, the report states “an island state threatened with rising sea levels may decide they have nothing to lose, or a well funded individual with good intentions may take matters into their own hands. There are signs that this is already starting to occur.”

“Recent studies”, the report goes on to state, “suggest that a small fleet of aircraft could inject a million tonnes of sulphur compounds into the stratosphere – enough to offset roughly half of the global warming experienced to date – for US$1-2 billion annually.”

According to environmental writer Clive Hamilton in a 2010 article for the Guardian “a powerful coalition of forces is quietly constellating around the idea of transforming the Earth’s atmosphere by simulating volcanic eruptions to counter the warming effects of carbon pollution. Engineering the planet’s climate system is attracting the attention of scientists, scientific societies, venture capitalists and conservative think tanks. Despite the enormity of what is being proposed — nothing less than taking control of Earth’s climate system — the public has been almost entirely excluded from the planning”.

In the context of the recent modeling tables published in Environmental Research Letters, these words by Hamilton (himself a believer in man-made climate change) have been taken account before they commenced with their “global thermostat setting game”. Hamilton wrote in 2010:

“If there is no international agreement an impatient nation suffering the effects of climate disruption may decide to act alone. It is not out of the question that in three decades the climate of the Earth could be determined by a handful of Communist Party officials in Beijing. Or the government of an Australia crippled by permanent drought, collapsing agriculture and ferocious bushfires could risk the wrath of the world by embarking on a climate control project”.

Apart from the fact that any planetary scale geoengineering effort would be incomprehensibly irresponsible- and apart from the fact that anthropogenic global warming is in essence a pseudo-science- the fact that scientists are now envisioning an elite club of nations taking the reins in global geoengineering should make the alarm-bells go off all over the place.



Kristen Meghan Is a Former Air Force Pilot Turned Chemtrail, Geoengineering Whistleblower. (Full Interview)

Kristen Gave a Ground Breaking Presentation of What She Had Discovered About Geoengineering, Chemtrails While Serving Her Country. This Brave Young Lady Has Put Her Livelihood and Life on The Line for Us. - Watch And Listen to Her Incredible Insider Story

How to Protect yourself from toxic chemicals, pesticides, heavy metals and radiation from EMF's

Published: July 28, 2018

Join us for a deep, remarkable, and empowering investigation into the threats—biological and environmental—that chemicals now present in our daily lives. Do you know what chemicals are in your shampoo? How about your cosmetics? Do you know what’s in the plastic water bottles you drink from, or the roundup in your garage, or your children’s pajamas? If you’re like most of us, the answer is probably no. But you also probably figured that most of these products were safe and that someone—the manufacturers, the government—was looking out for you. The truth might surprise you.

Learn the truth about toxic chemicals, our alarming levels of exposure, and our government’s utter failure to regulate them effectively. This panel reveals how dangerous, and how common, toxins are in the most ordinary things, and in the most familiar of places:

• Our water: Thanks to suburban sprawl and agricultural runoff, 97 percent of our nation’s rivers and streams are now contaminated with everything from herbicides to pharmaceutical drugs.

• Our bodies: High levels of hormone-disrupting chemicals from cosmetics, flame-retardants from clothing and furniture, even long-banned substances like DDT and lead, are consistently showing up in human blood samples.

• Our homes: Many toxins lurk beneath our sinks and in our basements, of course, but did you know that they’re also found in wall-to-wall carpeting, plywood, and fabric softeners?

• Our yards: Pesticides, fungicides, even common fertilizers—there are enormous, unseen costs to our national obsession with pristine green lawns.

Learn how you can make informed decisions about the products you buy, and to disentangle yourself from unhealthy products you don’t need—so that you and your family can start living healthier lives now, and in the years to come. What you don’t know can hurt you.

Panel Participants: Devra Lee Davis, Ph.D., M.P.H., Beth Lambert, Beth Greer, Dave Hunter



David Keith on the BBC HARDtalk Show Geo-Engineering BBC Host - Stephen Sackur

TOP SECRET Mission - Chemtrail Pilots SPRAYING BLOOD Cause Face to Face Near Mid-Air Collisions!!!



Chemtrails - Fully Exposed - Airplane Pilots Spraying Carcinogenic Mind-altering Chemicals, or Newly Developed Viruses and Bacteria Over U.S. Population

Published on Feb 3, 2013

A small edition to the "Fully Exposed" family. Many more to come. From the people that brought you sandy hook fully exposed. Search "What In The World Are They Spraying?" if you would like a full in depth look at the issue.



Airplane Pilots Spraying Deadly Chemicals Over U.S. Population

Airplane Pilots Spraying Deadly Chemicals Over U.S. Population

Airplane Pilots Spraying Deadly Chemicals Over U.S. Population

Airplane Pilots Spraying Deadly Chemicals Over U.S. Population

An ounce of prevention is worth a ton of cure - the much causation of violent outbursts

- By Bahram Maskanian

What a practical and highly meaningful phrase, lets say it one more time: “An ounce of prevention is worth a ton of cure”.   The principles of prevention are applicable to all aspects of our lives: health, private life, social issues, politics, economics, foreign policy, environment and everything else in between. 

Crucial factors in implementing preventive solutions, which will determine their effectiveness, has to do with the nature of the problems, whether, or not if the problems are caused by sheer ignorance, or by design.  The second factor has to do with whether, or not there is open-mind and willingness on the part of the participants to let go of their indoctrinated ways, and are open to learn and evolve out of the indoctrination, willing to receive common sense education of dealing with any particular problems and prevent its reoccurrence in the future.

Since 1913, the United States population has been at the mercy of a few criminal evil families whose only goal is to keep people at each other’s throat.  Governments all over the world are governments of the nation-less corporations, by the nation-less corporations, for the nation-less corporations.  These evil bastards will attack their own people, through false flag operations, take their own nation to war, murdering innocent women and children to make more money, gain more control, covering up their own track and crimes.

Where all social, environmental, political and economic problems are deliberate construct of the criminal elites in charge, people themselves must implement the principles of prevention at the grass root level, without any expectations of help from any branch of government, local or federal.

Now, lets examine the effects of violence, alcohol, foods and drinks made from genetically modified organisms, coupled with the rampant use of mind-altering pharmaceutical drugs, prescribed to our children at the school, gangster rap, violent video games, violent news, violent sports, violent cartoons, violent TV programs, violent Hollywood movies, violent bullying and hazing behavior tolerated and unpunished by the educational system.

To make matters worse is the criminal act of what is known as Chemtrail, where U.S. government sprays people with all kinds of carcinogenic, mind-altering chemicals, newly engineered and developed viruses and bacteria at all hours of day and night, documented and confirmed by many sources.

Why would the government of the nation-less corporations, by the nation-less corporations, for the nation-less corporations would do such things? The answer is Eugenics!

Eugenics was first established and funded by the Carnegie Institute of Washington, Department of Eugenics and Rockefeller, in 1904, located at Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island New York. Eugenics is the criminal elite’s invention and practice of deciding who could breed and who should not. Sterilization of women and men has been the preferred method of achieving their hideous goals, which was done to thousands of colored prisoners and Army soldiers beginning in 1905. But that method is time consuming, expensive and obvious, leaving a trail of evidence on its path.

During War World One: 1914 - 1918, for the first time in modern history chemical weapons were used on a large-scale using aerial bombardment by airplanes instantly murdering thousands of people. The criminal elite whom started the war and financed it quickly learned the promising future of airplane, as we see today evolving in to unman vehicles and drones.

Since 1932, the whistle-blowers have revealed and reported that the U.S. government has been experimenting using U.S. citizens as lab rats. U.S. government agencies, such as U.S. Department of Agriculture, Homeland Security, Department of Defense, and many others, have over 32 times covertly aerial sprayed U.S. population. All of these reports were confirmed and admitted by various government officials and agencies.

The key word here is covert operation that went bust. No one knows exactly how many aerial spraying has been done, and is in progress on a daily bases. Look up in the sky and if you see a white trail of smoke in the air, you’ll know, that you are been sprayed.

Also one should take into account the mother’s womb, and mother’s living environment, diet, health and all other habits while pregnant with a child, where the child is nourished and grow for the first 9 months of her / his life, are the first vital factors.

Under the said conditions mentioned, implementation of prevention principles will only be possible at the grass root level.  Preventing our young minds from consuming and falling victims to all the above, and stay clear from their inevitable harmful and deadly hazards is the responsibility of their immediate family and the community in which they live.

Scientists have concluded that young peoples’ brain reach complete growth and maturity in terms of their brain faculties and cognitive process, at around 26 years of age, provided if they enjoyed having a healthy life, diet, caring and loving parents and environment, as they were growing up.  However, those adolescence who were deprived from having a healthy, loving environment and diet, exposed to all the violence numerated are most likely to pickup drinking alcohol, abusing drugs, eating unhealthy foods, unhealthy sleeping habits, which will make them highly susceptible to violent behavior and much more.

Life is a harsh training camp, particularly for the young and inexperienced minds.  Those whom are not equipped with the adequate amount of information and knowledge of how they should navigate their way through life are undoubtedly bound to fail.  This failure could manifest itself through violent outbursts, taking revenge on the rest of the society.  Person in such state of mind will find their weapon of choice regardless of what the gun laws permit, or prohibit.

In conclusion we learn that guns have nothing to do with the causation of such violent outbursts. Politicians use any excuse to disarm the population to gain more control over the people. Keep in mind that if the government and its forces are armed and allowed to have weapons with high-capacity ammunition magazines, so should we, the people, or we would not be able to defend ourselves.

I have nothing against background checks of weapon buyers, if it stays as a background check only, and not a citizens weapon registration tool, containing information regarding the types of weapons one own and where one live. So the government would have a comprehensive database, list of names and locations of citizens whom are armed and those whom are not!

 



Airplane Pilots Spraying Carcinogenic Mind-altering Chemicals, or Newly Developed Viruses and Bacteria Over U.S. Population

TOP SECRET Mission - Chemtrail Pilots SPRAYING BLOOD Cause Face to Face Near Mid-Air Collisions!!!



Chemtrails - Fully Exposed

Published on Feb 3, 2013

A small edition to the "Fully Exposed" family. Many more to come. From the people that brought you sandy hook fully exposed.  Search "What In The World Are They Spraying?" if you would like a full in depth look at the issue.



Airplane Pilots Spraying Deadly Chemicals Over U.S. Population

Airplane Pilots Spraying Deadly Chemicals Over U.S. Population

Airplane Pilots Spraying Deadly Chemicals Over U.S. Population

Airplane Pilots Spraying Deadly Chemicals Over U.S. Population

U.S. Dairy industry has petitioned the FDA to approve Aspartame as hidden, unlabeled additive in all dairies: milk, yogurt, eggnog, cream, etc.

- By Mike Adams, the Health Ranger - Monday, February 25, 2013

U.S. Dairy industry has petitioned the FDA to approve Aspartame as hidden, unlabeled additive in all dairies: milk, yogurt, eggnog, cream, etc.(NaturalNews) You probably already know that the FDA has declared war on raw milk and even helped fund and coordinate armed government raids against raw milk farmers and distributors. Yes, it's insane. This brand of tyranny is unique to the USA and isn't even conducted in China, North Kora or Cuba. Only in the USA are raw milk farmers treated like terrorists.

But now the situation is getting even more insane than you could have imagined: the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) have filed a petition with the FDA asking the FDA to alter the definition of "milk" to secretly include chemical sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose.

Importantly, none of these additives need to be listed on the label. They will simply be swept under the definition of "milk," so that when a company lists "milk" on the label, it automatically includes aspartame or sucralose. And if you're trying to avoid aspartame, you'll have no way of doing so because it won't be listed on the label.

This isn't only for milk, either: It's also for yogurt, cream, sour cream, eggnog, whipping cream and a total of 17 products, all of which are listed in the petition at FDA.gov.

As the petition states:

IDFA and NMPF request their proposed amendments to the milk standard of identity to allow optional characterizing flavoring ingredients used in milk (e.g., chocolate flavoring added to milk) to be sweetened with any safe and suitable sweetener -- including non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame.

This is all being done to "save the children," we're told, because the use of aspartame in milk products would reduce calories.

Milk industry specifically asks to HIDE aspartame from consumers

Astonishingly, the dairy industry is engaged in extreme doublespeak logic and actually arguing that aspartame should be hidden from consumers by not listing it on the label. Here's what the petition says:

IDFA and NMPF argue that nutrient content claims such as "reduced calorie" are not attractive to children, and maintain that consumers can more easily identify the overall nutritional value of milk products that are flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners if the labels do not include such claims. Further, the petitioners assert that consumers do not recognize milk -- including flavored milk -- as necessarily containing sugar. Accordingly, the petitioners state that milk flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners should be labeled as milk without further claims so that consumers can "more easily identify its overall nutritional value."

In other words, hiding aspartame from consumers by not including it on the label actually helps consumers, according to the IDFA and NMPF!

Yep, consumers are best served by keeping them ignorant. If this logic smacks of the same kind of twisted deception practiced by Monsanto, that's because it's identical: the less consumers know, the more they are helped, according to industry. And it's for the children, too, because children are also best served by keeping them poisoned with aspartame.

Consumers have always been kept in the dark about pink slime, meat glue, rBGH and GMOs in their food. And now, if the IDFA gets its way, you'll be able to drink hormone-contaminated milk from an antibiotics-inundated cow fed genetically modified crops and producing milk containing hidden aspartame. And you won't have the right to know about any of this!

The FDA confirms this "secret" status of aspartame, stating, "If the standard of identity for milk is amended as requested by petitioners, milk manufacturers could use non-nutritive sweeteners in flavored milk without a nutrient content claim in its labeling."

FDA requests comments

The FDA is requesting comments on this petition. You have until May 21st, 2013 to submit your comments. Click here for instructions.

This is a clue to stop drinking processed milk and milk products altogether

There's a bigger story here than just the industry hoping to get FDA approval to secretly put aspartame in milk products while not listing aspartame on the label.

The bigger question is this: If an industry is pushing to hide aspartame in its products, what else is it already hiding?

How about the pus content of its dairy products? How about its inhumane treatment of animals who are subjected to torture conditions and pumped full of genetically engineered hormones? How about the fact that homogenization and pasteurization turn a whole food into a dietary nightmare that promotes obesity, autoimmune disorders and cardiovascular disease?

There are lots of dirty little secrets in the dairy industry of course, and that doesn't even get into the secret closed-door conversations to encourage the FDA to destroy the competition of raw milk.

The only rational answer to all this is to stop buying and consuming processed dairy products, period!

I gave up ALL milk products many years ago and have never looked back. I drink almond milk, not pus-filled pasteurized cow's milk. (Click here for a recipe to make your own almond milk at home.) I don't eat yogurt. If I want probiotics, I get them from tasty chewable probiotics supplements such as Sunbiotics. I parted ways with processed dairy products many years ago, and as a result, my cardiovascular health, skin health, digestive health and stamina have all remained in outstanding shape.

There's also a philosophical issue here: Don't buy products from an industry that habitually LIES about everything. The dairy industry is like a mafia. They actively seek to destroy the competition, keep consumers ignorant and monopolize the market. They run highly deceptive ads with ridiculous claims like, "drinking milk helps you lose weight" and other nonsense.

The U.S. dairy industry is steeped in deception at every level, and now they want you and your children to unknowingly drink aspartame that's secretly blended into the product.

The dairy industry is to food as Lance Armstrong is to sports. It's all a big lie, laced with secret chemicals and false claims.

Stop drinking milk. Stop financially supporting the food mafia.