What An Honest And Legitimate Election Looks Like?
- By Bahram Maskanian - December 13, 2013
As U.S. Citizens and Patriots, it is our moral obligation to protect our families, our sovereignty and our country, by boycotting all elections, thus exposing the current fraudulent so called election and begin to truly reform each of our State's election procedures.
We must establish honest, legitimate and concrete rules to govern our elections immediately, starting by abolishing the Federal Election Commission, removing the republicrat's (republicans and democrats) monopoly over local and or national election laws, procedures, predetermined and fraudulent outcomes.
We must prohibit the use of any and all electronic, computerized, or manual voting machines, mail in and or absentee ballots. We should start using paper ballots as the only means of conducting all local and national elections. The November 3 should be national election holiday. All national and local voting must be done in person.
We, the people must end the winner take all election method; and replace it with proportional representation system, through instant run off voting. - All discriminatory rules and regulations preventing eligible voters to vote must be null and void.
All felons should be eligible to vote after they have completed their sentences. Only U.S. Born and Naturalized citizens over the age of 17 should be eligible to vote. All voters must register and obtain Voter Picture ID Card, each with unique identifying 15 digit PDF417 barcode, without any microchips embedded in the card. (Not A National ID CARD) - Voter ID should be provided to all eligible voters free of charge for voting in elections only. The Voter ID will be necessary, allowing the voter to vote in local and or national elections, and for any candidate, regardless of political party affiliations.
The Voter ID must be renewed every 10 years in person. In order for any candidate to win any local and or national elected office in the United States, they shall require 65% of the votes. Each of the 10,000 U.S. voter jurisdictions must form their own independent election team of monitors made up of local community members to conduct the voting process and count all the votes at the end of the same voting day. (160 million U.S. registered voters, divided by 10,000 number of jurisdictions, comes to 16,000 votes to be counted per jurisdiction, and it would take 4 election staff members only 2 hours to count all the votes)
All legitimate ballots / votes, plus all documentations, related physical and electronic communications must be kept, saved for a period of 24 months. Furthermore, all elected and selected politicians and government officials who wish to abandon their office and responsibilities in mid term to run for another office, must resign their current position and office permanently first.
The criminal greedy men who crashed the world
The criminal greedy men who crashed the world - Meltdown - PART 2
The first of a four-part investigation into a world of greed and recklessness that led to financial collapse.
In the first episode of Meltdown, we hear about four men who brought down the global economy: a billionaire mortgage-seller who fooled millions; a high-rolling banker with a fatal weakness; a ferocious Wall Street predator; and the power behind the throne.
The crash of September 2008 brought the largest bankruptcies in world history, pushing more than 30 million people into unemployment and bringing many countries to the edge of insolvency. Wall Street turned back the clock to 1929.
But how did it all go so wrong?
Lack of government regulation; easy lending in the US housing market meant anyone could qualify for a home loan with no government regulations in place.
Also, London was competing with New York as the banking capital of the world. Gordon Brown, the British finance minister at the time, introduced 'light touch regulation' - giving bankers a free hand in the marketplace.
All this, and with key players making the wrong financial decisions, saw the world's biggest financial collapse.
Why 500 TRILLION $ Rich Rothschild's are NOT on Forbes Richest People List?
Published on August 1, 2013
Everything you need to know about the House of Rothschild
http://wakeupcallnews.blogspot.com/20...
PLEASE READ THE "Evidence" about The Rothschilds: From The New American.
"World Bank Insider Blows Whistle on Corruption, Federal Reserve"
Written by Alex Newman
A former insider at the World Bank, ex-Senior Counsel Karen Hudes, says the global financial system is dominated by a small group of corrupt, power-hungry figures centered around the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy...
Coast to Coast: watch?v=FWGj-Im98fo&hd=1
WorldBank Whistleblower: watch?v=5HLj0TiM-sg&hd=1
World Bank Revolving Door of Corruption: watch?v=4wDcnrIzi3Y&hd=1
World Bank: Money Laundering Criminals: watch?v=c7E9SUwlooE&hd=1
The Birth of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank - How usury destroyed America
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q93R5E...
It's The Bankers People! They control all people and things...
Learn all you can about The Rothschilds...
This video is just some proof that the Forbes Richest People List is a joke and meant to keep the truth from us, The Rothschilds own the worlds media, so you won't see this on the nightly news... The richest families in the world don't want us to know who is really running it.
The Richest People On The Planet 2013
http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/
The Rothschilds, world kingpins, worth $500 trillion! They own Reuters, AP, and fix the price of gold...
http://tobefree.wordpress.com/2010/05...
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
§ 107.Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or photo records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages/video may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, economic, DEMOCRACY, scientific, MORAL, ETHICAL, and SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.
Icelanders Overthrow Government and Rewrite Constitution After Banking Fraud-No Word From US Media
- By Rebecca Savastio - Guardian Writer - December 2, 2013
Can you imagine participating in a protest outside the White House and forcing the entire U.S. government to resign? Can you imagine a group of randomly chosen private citizens rewriting the U.S. constitution to include measures banning corporate fraud? It seems incomprehensible in the U.S., but Icelanders did just that. Icelanders forced their entire government to resign after a banking fraud scandal, overthrowing the ruling party and creating a citizen’s group tasked with writing a new constitution that offered a solution to prevent corporate greed from destroying the country. The constitution of Iceland was scrapped and is being rewritten by private citizens; using a crowd-sourcing technique via social media channels such as Facebook and Twitter. These events have been going on since 2008, yet there’s been no word from the U.S. mainstream media about any of them. In fact, all of the events that unfolded were recorded by international journalists, overseas news bureaus, citizen journalists and bloggers. This has created current accusations of an intentional cover up of the story by mainstream U.S. news sources.
An “iReport” on CNN, written by a private citizen in May 2012, has questioned the reasons why this revolution has not been widely covered in the U.S., suggesting that perhaps the mainstream media is controlled by large corporate interests and thus has been unwilling to report on Iceland’s activities. That report is currently making its way around social media. CNN today placed a statement on its website saying: “We’ve noticed this iReport is being shared widely on Facebook and Twitter. Please note that this article was posted in May 2012. CNN has not yet verified the claims and we’re working to track down the original writer.” It is interesting to note that CNN’s European version, CNN Europe, already covered the story of the protests and the government’s resignation, leading many to question why CNN would now need to “look into” the claims.
Besides CNN Europe’s own coverage of the scandal, the events in Iceland were widely covered by international media and are easily verified by a simple search on Google which leads to a variety of reputable international news sources that ran numerous stories on the Icelandic revolution. A whole documentary has been made on the governmental overthrow called Pots, Pans and Other Solutions, and now, the conversation is focused on whether or not the citizens’ actions actually worked to make Iceland a more equitable nation.
To understand the enormity of what happened in Iceland, it’s best to draw parallels between the initial banking fraud that caused Iceland’s economy to collapse and the banking fraud in the U.S. that caused the mortgage crisis six years ago. In Iceland, unscrupulous bankers had inflated the value of Iceland’s banks internationally which in turn caused the “bubble” to eventually burst in 2008 and saw most of Iceland’s banks going bankrupt.
A similar situation happened in the U.S. just one year before the collapse in Iceland, with the mortgage crisis of 2007. Mortgage lenders in the U.S. knowingly lent money to prospective homeowners who could not afford to purchase a home. This, in turn, led to falsely inflated home values and a vicious cycle of too much lending. Just as in Iceland, the bubble burst and many U.S. banks were about to declare bankruptcy. In Iceland, the citizens took to the streets by the thousands, banging pots and pans in what is known as the “pots and pans revolution,” leading to the arrest and prosecution of many unscrupulous bankers responsible for the economic collapse. Icelandic citizens also refused to pay for the sins of the bankers and rejected any measures of taxation to bail them out. In the U.S., the government bailed out the banks and arrested no one.
The pots and pans revolution in Iceland was not covered by mainstream U.S. media. In fact, any information about this revolution is found only on international newspapers, blogs and online documentaries, not on mainstream front-page articles as would be expected from news organizations covering a story of this magnitude. The New York Times published a small handful of piecemeal stories, blogs and opinion pieces, but mostly glossed over the main narrative by saying the 2008 financial collapse in Iceland caused “mayhem far beyond the country’s borders” rather than pointing out that Icelanders took to the streets with pots and pans and forced their entire government to resign.
As the saying goes, “there are two sides to every story,” but a more accurate articulation of this phrase would be “in any story, there are multiple sides, viewpoints, opinions and perspectives.” The story in Iceland is no exception. Socialist and Marxist blogs here in the U.S. say that there’s been a massive U.S. news conspiracy and cover up about the revolution in Iceland because the U.S. media is controlled by corporations, including banks, and the “powers that be” don’t want U.S. citizens getting any ideas to stage a revolution of their own. Some conservative Icelandic bloggers claim that while there was, indeed, a revolution, it did not lead to a successful or widely accepted new constitution. They say the situation in Iceland is worse than ever, and that international news reports of an effective democratic uprising leading to a better government are simply myths. Social media commenters are scratching their heads over why they were robbed of the story of Iceland’s pots and pans revolution.
As with most narratives, the truth may lie somewhere in the middle of all of these varying perspectives. One thing is clear, though: it’s nearly impossible to find one mainstream U.S. news report of the pots and pans revolution in Iceland, the resignation of Iceland’s entire government, and the jailing of the bankers responsible for the economic collapse there. Whether or not the revolution led to a more fair government or a workable and effective constitution is irrelevant to the fact that the U.S. media has essentially skipped over this story for the past five years.
Is it possible that mainstream media sources purposely covered up the Iceland story to appease their corporate sponsors? It doesn’t seem likely, and yet, what explanation could be given as to why this news never made it to the front pages of our most trusted media organizations here in the U.S.?
As Iceland struggles to regain its footing with a new government, U.S. citizens may or may not be able to look to Iceland as an example of perfect democracy in action. The real question, though, is why weren’t U.S. citizens given the information about the ousting of the Icelandic government and the jailing of the unscrupulous bankers? Are journalists in control of the mainstream media or is there some truth to accusations that big business may, in fact, be strong-arming reporters to keep quiet about world events that could inspire similar actions here in the U.S.?